Search for: "AVERY DENNISON CORP"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2010, 2:13 am
Avery Dennison Corp., No. 09 C 5980, Slip Op. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 3:29 am
Avery Dennison Corp. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
Avery Dennison Corp., the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the district court’s decision to dismiss 3M’s declaratory judgment action for lack of jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:33 am
In its weekly Orders List, the Supreme Court, without opinion, denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Avery Dennison Corp. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:47 am
Avery Dennison Corp., No. 09 C 5980, Slip. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:51 am
Avery Dennison Corp., adds some clarity, but determining whether a declaratory judgment complaint for non-infringement is ripe will still depend heavily on the facts, or, as an earlier Federal Circuit case put it, “there is no bright-line rule for distinguishing those cases that satisfy the actual case-or-controversy requirement from those that do not. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:28 am
Avery Dennison Corp., Fed. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 10:59 am
Avery Dennison Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:23 pm
See Exxon Corp. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:41 am
Avery Dennison Corp., — F.4th. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 12:32 am
" Avery Dennison Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:40 pm
Avery Dennison Corp., 55 F.4th 900 (Fed. [read post]
15 May 2023, 7:21 am
Another petition pending before the Court is the eligibility appeal in Avery Dennison Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:32 am
The court was guided by Avery Dennison Corp. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 4:50 am
Avery Dennison Corp., 281 F.3d 676, 681 (7th Cir. 2002), the Court held as follows: Bosch’s evidence that the Chairman was not involved in relevant events was persuasive. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 2:18 am
Diamonair USA, Inc., Opposition No. 91163668 [Section 2(d) opposition to DIAMONICE for jewelry, based up the registered mark DIAMONIQUE for jewelry].April 24, 2007 - 10 AM: In re Avery Dennison Corp., Serial Nos. 78564892 and 78563257 [Refusal of the phrase HELLO MY NAME IS in standard character and design form (below) for "paper name tags and paper labels" on the ground that the phrase is merely informational and does not function as a trademark].April 24, 2007… [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:37 am
Haar (2d Cir. 2001) (holding, before the TDRA increased the fame standard, that trademark holder’s annual sales of $280 million were not enough to constitute fame); Avery Dennison Corp. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:24 am
Avery Dennision Corp., et al. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:24 am
Avery Dennision Corp., et al. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:33 am
” Toro, 61 U.S.P.Q.2d at 1179 (quoting Avery Dennison Corp. v. [read post]
